GOOD:
1. Bush: for protecting us from terrorist attacks for another four years.
2. Obama: for selecting Rick Warren for the inaugural prayer.
3. Israel: for finally responding to rocket attacks from the Gaza Strip.
4. Bush Administration: for finally getting Iraq more or less under control with the surge.
5. Congress: for not giving in immediately to the big 3 automakers' demands for government bailouts.
BAD:
1. Bush: for warrantless wiretapping.
2. Bush: for pushing through a $700B "rescue" bill for the rich bankers without oversight.
3. Congress: for letting Bush push through the ridiculous bill.
4. Congress: for not fixing Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac in years previous when the Republicans wanted it fixed!
5. Blagojevich: for major ethics violations.
Today's Post: Obama wants to control insurance company premiums. What a disaster!
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Sunday, December 28, 2008
Ethics
U.S. Senators and Congressmen must follow the same laws that government employees and contractors are required to follow in the areas of gifts, personal contacts, etc. We must curtail the influence of lobbyists. Former government employees should be prohibited from becoming lobbyists for a period of two years after they work for the government.
Saturday, December 27, 2008
Religion and Government
According to the Constitution, religion should be free of interference from the government, not vice versa. The “establishment of religion” clause means “taxation from people to directly support a state-sponsored sect.” That’s one thing government is not to do. The other is to not “prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” That includes the free exercise of religion or absence of religion of those in the government!
There is no doctrine of “separation of church and state” found there—it is a recent phenomenon invented by secularists of the 20th century. Recent Supreme Court rulings have affirmed that students and teachers are allowed to pray in schools, provided no one is forced to participate. Local, state, and national government entities open their meetings with prayer—the Supreme Court has affirmed this practice. It has also affirmed that the words “In God We Trust” on our currency is constitutional.
However, the government should not interfere with the right of each person to choose his or her beliefs and act on them, provided they do not break the laws or interfere with others' rights. Neither should churches be allowed to sponsor or promote a particular candidate or party.
There is no doctrine of “separation of church and state” found there—it is a recent phenomenon invented by secularists of the 20th century. Recent Supreme Court rulings have affirmed that students and teachers are allowed to pray in schools, provided no one is forced to participate. Local, state, and national government entities open their meetings with prayer—the Supreme Court has affirmed this practice. It has also affirmed that the words “In God We Trust” on our currency is constitutional.
However, the government should not interfere with the right of each person to choose his or her beliefs and act on them, provided they do not break the laws or interfere with others' rights. Neither should churches be allowed to sponsor or promote a particular candidate or party.
Thursday, December 25, 2008
Marriage and the Family

Marriage laws are non-discriminatory, provided the marriage is between a man and a woman. There never has been a fundamental right for one person to marry another person of the same sex. Civil unions currently provide many of the same benefits for gays and lesbians in some states. In other states, filing a few legal documents does the same thing.
Abortion

Abortion is the law of the land. We may never see the Supreme Court reverse itself on its Roe v. Wade ruling of 1973. However, to make it safer and rarer, we can regulate it in a much better manner.
Few people know this, but most modern abortion methods were developed in the Nazi prison camps of the holocaust (according to Abortion and Social Justice, NY: Sheed & Ward, 1972). The documents explaining the methods were put under seal right after World War II along with most of the other captured documents and were not released en masse until the late 1960s. It may be no coincidence that the abortion industry started pushing so hard at this time for legalization. Many of these documents are still available through the Freedom of Information Act from the U.S. Government Printing Office.
Based on principles found in many macro-economic textbooks, I believe that abortion started negatively affecting our economy about fifteen years after it was legalized by judicial fiat. How? By reducing our birth rate, we reduced the rate at which the economy could grow and reduced the number of young people able to take on the entry-level jobs and be consumers. This forced the government to turn its back on immigration laws (see Immigration). Donald Mann, President of NPG, said that “Macro economic growth requires a growing labor force so that GNP can increase constantly. A growing labor force is only possible if population grows, and population growth in the U.S. depends largely on massive immigration.” By reducing abortion rates, we can improve our economy without illegal immigration.
Late-term abortions are extremely dangerous and must be eliminated. This includes such practices as “partial-birth abortion”—inducing a dangerous breach birth, leaving the head within the birth canal, and destroying the baby’s brain with the medical equivalent of a pair of scissors—are barbaric by any standards. The one exception to late-term abortion should be when the mother’s health is endangered. Even then, the child can be often be delivered by caesarian section and saved anyway. The survivability rate of children born normally after 6-month terms is very high. Mid-term abortions should only take place to save the life of the mother, or in the case of rape or incest.
Abortions performed on minors must be with a parent’s consent. No other medical procedure is allowed without it. Why should this be any different? If complications result (and they do in as many as 25% of cases—see Abortion Complications for more information), the parent must know what is wrong so he or she can make informed decisions about medical care.
Planned Parenthood’s motto is “Every child a wanted child.” In practice, the result is “Every child a wanted child—if not, kill it.” So, what do we do with all the “unwanted” children? First, let’s attack the myth about unwanted children. With an increase in infertility rates here is the USA, there is a shortage of infants up for adoption. This has been true for the last twenty years and more. Many people are forced to go overseas in order to find babies. There are no unwanted infants. As far as the older children go, there are studies that show that “unwanted” children show no more deviance or problems later in life than “wanted” children. There remains the problem of abandoned and abused children. We need to change the laws to make them easier to adopt instead of forcing them into perpetual foster care. Furthermore, we must encourage families to adopt them and provide those families with support to handle the potential for emotional and behavioral problems caused by abuse. Click here for more information.
Labels:
abortion,
immigration,
regulation,
supreme court
Social Security

Labels:
401K,
benefits,
fiscal policy,
IRA,
social issues,
social security
Salary Caps

The status quo was caused by current governmental regulations. We must change those regulations to prevent these types of relationships. If necessary, we must cap salaries based on some formula of sales, profits, number of employees, average employee salary, etc.
The Banking Industry

The Stock Market
Government Spending

Here is my plan to limit spending:
(1) Kick out the illegal aliens. They sap our economy by using our schools, our universities, our hospitals, and our public facilities, paying almost nothing in taxes, since they live mostly in an underground economy.
(2) Pass rules in both houses of congress to limit earmarks to no more than 1% of a fiscal bill. Give the President a line item veto. It is clear that the founding fathers didn’t conceive of the huge spending bills we would have today—for the first view decades, each “line item” was a separate bill, requiring every single spending proposal to stand or fall on its own.
(3) Limit spending increases to no more than the current inflation index.
(4) Pass no new entitlements and start phasing out all the existing ones except Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Food Stamps. Remove the revenues for these programs from the general budget and manage them separately again.
(5) Eliminate programs that don’t work.
(6) Eliminate fraud, waste, and abuse.
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
Taxes

The current tax rates are about right and should be extended before they expire in 2010. Some minor adjustments can be made to optimize revenue. Raising taxes on the rich only ensures that they will not be able to hire as many people, spend as much on goods, or take as many vacations. This is disastrous to the middle class, since the money would go to them. The poor shouldn’t be paying taxes—however, neither should we use “tax rebates” to “redistribute wealth.” This only encourages laxity.
Let’s get one thing straight—corporations don’t pay taxes, consumers pay them. Before you think about “soaking the corrupt corporations,” ask yourself, “Do I want the cost of everything I buy to go up?” Let’s leave corporate taxes where they are.
Inheritance taxes destroy small businesses, which employ half of all private sector employees, pay nearly 45 percent of total U.S. private payroll, and have generated 60 to 80 percent of net new jobs annually over the last decade (according to the SBA). Even if let the current inheritance tax holiday expire, we must eliminate all inheritance taxes on small businesses to keep our economy strong.
Labels:
domestic policy,
inheritance tax,
small business,
taxes
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Interpretation of the Constitution

To find out what the Constitution means, we need to look at how the people who wrote and ratified each article, section, and amendment viewed them. In other words, what did they mean them to say? They mean no more and no less. This is called "original meaning." The Constitution was written in plain English and was meant to be understood by the common man.
In order to prevent a few judges from ruling the land based on their arbitrary views, we need to appoint judges that interpret the Constitution using the principles of original meaning.
Sunday, December 7, 2008
Global Warming

The Earth's climate changes naturally all the time. If we're warming, we're warming no faster than the other planets, indicating variations in the sun's output may be the cause.
Labels:
climate change,
global warming,
kyoto,
pollution
Pollution

We still have some problems: illegal dumping, new pollutants from the electronics industry, and farming runoff. One thing will stop rampant illegal dumping: heavy enforcement. Polluters must be fined more heavily and jailed longer—these are crimes against many people as well as against our plants and animals.
Energy Policy

(1) Short term (1 - 5 years). Drill here. Drill now. With the technological improvements in drilling techniques, the danger of spills like we saw in the past is almost gone. We must drill in ANWR and off our coasts to supply our oil and natural gas needs. We must continue to mine coal and to use our best, cleanest methods of burning it to generate electricity.
(2) Medium Term (5– 15 years). Build more nuclear power plants based on French technology. Long-term storage of nuclear waste is not a problem. In the past it was believed that we would have to store the waste products for thousands of years. We now know that is not true: a mere one or two hundred years is all that’s needed.
(3) Long Term (15 – 30 years). Encourage the development of wind, tidal, recyclable waste, no-food bio-fuels, solar, and other technologies through both direct government investment and tax incentives. We don’t know what the next breakthrough will be. Therefore, we must start a myriad of small investments in many potential technologies, then weed out those that show no promise after a few years.
Labels:
alternative energy,
biofuels,
domestic policy,
energy
Intelligence

Missing actionable intelligence, as we did with 9-11, is inexcusable. As part of defense, we must maintain an intelligence capability more capable than any other in the world. As the only superpower left, we must know exactly what is going on and be able to respond to clear, actionable intelligence when needed. Getting it wrong, as we did in Iraq, cannot happen again—it’s simply too costly in lives and money. We must rebuild our HUMINT mission, as well as strengthen our SIGINT and IMINT capabilities.
War on Terrorism

Piracy on the high seas, whether done by state sanctioned privateers or independent groups, is growing rapidly. In many cases piracy is funding terrorism. We need to convene a new international conference and decide how to deal with the pirates. Can we set up decoy ships? Can we arm merchant vessels? In any case, we must deal with the problem before it becomes worse.
Labels:
defense,
foreign policy,
piracy,
terrorism
Stationing of Troops

Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Defense

We should spend between one-third and one-half of our non-discretionary national budget on defense, making certain that our troops are well-supplied with the best technology we have to offer for the money.
We must never send our troops on a mission without the proper weaponry, outfitting, and supplies. Furthermore, we must give our forces under the United Nations the right to disobey orders that they see as foolhardy. For instance, in Somalia in 1993, U.S. commanders believed we were under-gunned before going into Operation Gothic Serpent, which led to the fiasco we now know as “Black Hawk Down.” However, they were constrained by President Clinton at the time to follow the orders of the local U.N. commander.
Saturday, November 22, 2008
Policing the World

Further, we must realize that the U.N. is currently a very corrupt organization run by third-world dictators who want to be superpowers. We must get more involvement from the Western Europeans in helping to oversee and reform the corruption—kicking out those in office who break the rules and holding governments accountable monetarily who back them up. In the end, however, if we can’t reform it, we need to leave it.
At the same time, we must stop trying to bring into NATO countries that have been traditionally aligned with Russia. This will only provoke Russia to invade those countries, as it did Georgia in 2008.
Labels:
foreign policy,
NATO,
Russia,
United Nations,
world police
Crime & Punishment

We need a top-down review of all levels of crime and their punishments to assure more equitable penalties—more heinous crimes receive higher fines and longer sentences. Furthermore, we need to address payment to the victims for theft or property destruction.
The overturning of many death sentences lately by the use of DNA has shown the corruption present in some offices of prosecution. Prosecutors must be held criminally accountable for withholding information that could clear defendants. We should enact a moratorium on capital punishment until we can reform how it's used.
Labels:
capital punishment,
crime,
punishment,
social issues
Healthcare & Insurance

Education and Training

In elementary and middle school, we must concentrate on the basics and make sure students really grasp the material before passing them to the next grade. We must go back to providing “real recess”—an unstructured play time at least twice a day to let kids work off their energy. This will significantly reduce the behavior problems in the classroom—especially from young boys. We must also quit forcing males to act like females in the classroom, expecting them to do "cutesy" busy-work projects that really have no bearing on the subject at hand.
Above all, we need to encourage competition in the school system. Vouchers for students in underperforming schools will provide this, as well as raises for administrators and teachers in higher-performing schools. However, supplying vouchers for all is not the way to go. It will only cause chaos, raise the cost of private education, and hurt the good public schools. No more than 10% of the students in a state should be supplied with vouchers.
Generally, a pay raise for teachers will attract experienced people who have proven themselves in industry and business to the educational arena. Control of public education must be returned to state and local government, abolishing the U.S. Department of Education. We must reduce the cost of bureaucracy in order to allow more of the money to be used to pay teachers.
Where charitable organizations cannot keep up, local and state government should provide training in new areas to people who are affected by industry downsizings, but only if no other jobs are available in that industry. Workers should be encouraged (through tax relief) to update their education when downsizing is foreseen.
Labels:
education,
job training,
schools,
social issues,
vouchers
Immigration

Why do we need to allow more people in? Because our economy will not grow otherwise. We have been killing off much of our growth for the last forty years by allowing abortion on demand. The only way to make up for it is to allow more people into the country legally and give them opportunities they don’t have where they come from.
If we allow more people in legally and enforce laws against illegal aliens, our economy will benefit because much of the money that currently goes into the underground economy will be shifted to the legal side of the economy, supplying more true income for legitimate small business that will provide additional jobs and additional revenue for the government.
Labels:
aliens,
illegal immigrants,
immigration,
race,
social issues
Affirmative Action

Hate Crimes and Hate Speech

What is hate speech? Hate speech IS NOT saying you disagree with someone. Neither is it pointing out scientifically established negative consequences. Hate speech IS calling for death or persecution of a group. Is it wrong? Definitely. Can we stop it or punish it? No. We are a “free speech” society, and no matter how abhorrent the opinion, to curtail it is unconstitutional. Besides, if we outlaw it, the perpetrators will just go underground. At least with free speech, we know who they are and can fight them with our words of truth and actions of love.
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Race Relations

So how do we overcome this? Education and enforcement.
First, we need to continually reinforce these major tenets in schools, in advertisements, and in continuing adult education:
1. “All people are created equal.” No one is inherently more important than anyone else. No one should be denied a job or membership in a civic group because of race, creed, color, or gender. No one should be denied advancement because of these characteristics. In the case of churches or religious institutions, they should never be allowed to discriminate in hiring or membership based on race, color, or gender. Obviously, a faith-based group should be able to assure that those that join it or work for it believe as the group does.
2. “Don’t disparage other races, or your own race for that matter, in your speech or writing.” Don’t use racial epithets, period. Don’t tell racist jokes. Tell those who do that you don’t appreciate hearing that type of language.
3. “Try to understand other points of view.” Learn about their culture, the situation they grew up in, where they live now, and how they’ve been treated. As long as it’s not about corrupt practices (like rampant bribery in some countries), embrace cultural differences.
4. “Listen to others’ concerns.” You don’t know how they feel and can’t address their problems unless you listen.
5. “Show respect to everyone, regardless of situation.” Remember, they have all the same rights you do.
6. “Love everyone and help those in need.” Need I say more?
Next, we must continue to hold employers, government workers, and accountable for following the law and for training their employees in diversity and tolerance. However, we must never use “affirmative action” or quotas. Dr. King said it best when he said that each person should be evaluated on their own merits rather than by the color of their skin.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)